Legal Opinion

Tomkovich v. Mistevich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1923No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Luka Tomkovich, Milica, his wife, and Rocco Pavicevich were partners doing a small grocery and meat business at the village of Wakefield under the firm name of Pavicevich & Tomkovich. Tomkovich and wife made a promissory note to defendant Mistevich due July 29, 1916, for $257. On July 18, 1916, the* note not being due, Mistevich filed with a justice of the peace an affidavit for a writ of attachment reciting that “there is justly due him from Luka Tomkovich and Milica Tomkovich, copartners, the sum of $257,” and that:

“He has good reason to believe and does believe that defendants are about to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Artman v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Haynes v. KnowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Kunze v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lambert v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Young v. Motor City Apartments Limited Dividend Housing Ass'n No 1 & No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Breslin v. Vornado, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Lesher v. BrosteauMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API