Tomkovich v. Mistevich
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Luka Tomkovich, Milica, his wife, and Rocco Pavicevich were partners doing a small grocery and meat business at the village of Wakefield under the firm name of Pavicevich & Tomkovich. Tomkovich and wife made a promissory note to defendant Mistevich due July 29, 1916, for $257. On July 18, 1916, the* note not being due, Mistevich filed with a justice of the peace an affidavit for a writ of attachment reciting that “there is justly due him from Luka Tomkovich and Milica Tomkovich, copartners, the sum of $257,” and that:
“He has good reason to believe and does believe that defendants are about to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Artman v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Haynes v. KnowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Kunze v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Lambert v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Young v. Motor City Apartments Limited Dividend Housing Ass'n No 1 & No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Breslin v. Vornado, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lesher v. BrosteauMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.