Legal Opinion

Richstein v. Roesch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1946No. File No. 8763PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the wrongful conversion of a caterpillar tractor. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

On appeal defendant asserts (1) that the court erred in directing in its instructions a verdict on the issue of conversion; (2) that the trial court exceeded its authority in the pre-trial proceedings; and (3) that there was prejudicial error committed by the trial judge in communicating with the jurors after the case had been submitted to them and without notice to or the consent of the parties or their counsel.

That part of the instructions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Spooner v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Steele v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Davis v. BuffumSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
  5. Hall v. Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prewitt v. BranhamTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Desbien v. Penokee Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Scherf v. MyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rapid Sewing Center, Inc. v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Branham v. PrewittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API