Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 1992No. 911097350; CA A72018PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendant appeals from an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.307(6). The trial court found that, because of a mental disorder, defendant was unable to provide for her basic personal needs and was not receiving the care necessary for her health or safety. ORS 426.005(2) (b). On de novo review, we affirm.

At the time of the hearing on October 25, 1991, defendant was 21 years old and three or four months pregnant. She had no money and did not receive Social Security benefits. She had been released from jail and, although her parole officer had sent her to a homeless shelter, she was unable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Matter of PhyllCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. HerdanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API