State v. Evjen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*370DURHAM, J.
Appellant challenges a civil commitment order. ORS 426.130. On de novo review, State v. Waites, 71 Or App 366, 368, 692 P2d 654 (1984), we affirm the order on the ground that appellant is a “mentally ill person” because, due to a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health and safety. ORS 426.130(1)(b); ORS 426.005(2)(b). There is no dispute but that appellant has a mental disorder.
Two examiners appointed under ORS 426.075(2) testified that appellant did not meet the criteria for commitment. The trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. WaitesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. KerriganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. C. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. CRCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.