Matter of Phyll
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Appellant appeals an order of the circuit court finding her to be a mentally ill person and committing her to the State Mental Health Division. We review de novo on the record to determine whether beyond a reasonable doubt appellant is unable to provide for her basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for her health and safety pursuant to ORS 426.005(2). 1 We conclude that the evidence is not sufficient to meet the beyond a reasonable doubt test.
The standard for determining whether a person is able to provide for basic needs was set forth by this court in State v.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of JepsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992