Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 1992No. M92-2-2; CA A73525PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*329EDMONDS, J.

Appellant appeals an order finding him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment. The order was based on a finding that he is unable to provide for his basic needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for his health or safety. ORS 426.005(2)(b).1 Appellant contends that the finding was not supported by clear and convincing evidence, as required by ORS 426.130. We review de novo, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), and reverse.

Appellant was hospitalized in Chicago in November, 1991, for a mental disorder and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Matter of AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Matter of FletcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. SeaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API