Legal Opinion

State v. Bolander

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2001No. 9906-65271; A107099PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*516KISTLER, J.

The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division because it found that, as a result of a mental disorder, she was unable to provide for her basic needs.1 On appeal, appellant argues that the record does not support the trial court’s finding. We review de novo and affirm.

Appellant is a 36-year-old woman, who suffers from a combination of medical conditions. She is diabetic and has been instructed to follow a special diet to control that condition. She also suffers from bipolar disorder. As both examiners explained, as a result of her disorder, she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. M.J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. SaephanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API