Legal Opinion

State v. Herdan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1994No. 9309-97225; CA A81547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Appellant, an alleged mentally ill person, seeks review of an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.307(6). The trial court found that he is a person who, because of a mental disorder, is unable to provide for his basic needs and is not receiving such care as necessary for health and safety, and that he is a danger to himself. ORS 426.005(2). On de novo review, we affirm.

Appellant acknowledges that he suffers from a mental disorder (bipolar disorder). He argues, however, that the state failed to establish that he is mentally ill under ORS 426.005(2) because it did not prove by clear and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. A. D. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. F.H.Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API