Legal Opinion

Broadmoor Dairy & Live Stock Co. v. Brookside Water & Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1898No. 3469PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

This action was originally brought by appellants in the district court of El Paso county to restrain appellees from diverting, through and by means of a certain pipe line, the water flowing in Cheyenne creek, a natural stream situate in El Paso county. The material facts, as they appear from the pleadings and evidence, are in brief as follows :

The appellants, through various conveyances, are the present owners of the Cheyenne ditch, constructed in 1860 (and alleged to have been enlarged in 1862) for the purpose of diverting and appropriating the waters of said creek to the irrigation of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Montrose Canal Co. v. Loutsenhizer Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Dorr v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Farmers' Union Ditch Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Town of Sterling v. Pawnee Ditch Extension Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Bates v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Hinderlider v. Town of BerthoudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API