Montrose Canal Co. v. Loutsenhizer Ditch Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the District Qourt of Montrose Oounty.
1Per curiam
This is an action brought by The Montrose Canal Company and the other plaintiffs in error, in be*234half of themselves and other users and appropriators of water through its canal, to restrain The Loutsenhizer Ditch Company, and all persons using water through its ditch, and W. J. Toland, water commissioner of district No. 41, from diverting or preventing certain waters of the Uncompahgre river from flowing into the Montrose canal, predicating their right to such relief upon an alleged priority to such waters to the extent of 481 cubic feet per second of time for the purpose of irrigation; and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Farmers Independent Ditch Co. v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Boulder & Weld County Ditch Co. v. Lower Boulder Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Greer v. HeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Jacobucci v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Farmers' Union Ditch Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Town of Sterling v. Pawnee Ditch Extension Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.