Legal Opinion

Farmers' Union Ditch Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1906No. 4695PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Costilla County. Hon. Charles C. Holbrook, Judge. . Action by The Farmers ’ Union Ditch Company and others against The Rio Grande Canal Company and others. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Decision en banc.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gabbert

A statutory adjudication of 'water rights for the purposes of irrigation was had in Water District No. 20, by proceedings commenced in 1889 and concluded in 1891. In October, 1901, The Farmers’ Union Ditch Company instituted proceedings for a further adjudication of rights in this district. The remaining appellants joined in these proceedings, to which appellees were made parties. From the final judgment rendered, the parties claiming to be aggrieved thereby have brought the case to this court for review by appeal. The facts necessary to an understanding of the questions involved will be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New Mercer Ditch Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Montrose Canal Co. v. Loutsenhizer Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Boulder & Weld County Ditch Co. v. Lower Boulder Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Van Wagenen v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kavanagh v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API