Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1961No. Civ. 6423PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The plaintiffs, who are the appellants herein, as taxpayers and property owners along a proposed freeway, filed a complaint against the State of California, the California Highway Commission, the Secretary of State of the State of California and the Department of Public Works of the State of California, as defendants, who are the respondents herein, contending that the resolution of the commission locating the route for a proposed freeway was void; seeking a declaration to this effect; and asking that the defendants be enjoined from proceeding thereunder. The defendants demurred to the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oceanside Marina Towers Ass'n v. Oceanside Community Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Board of Supervisors of Merced County v. California Highway CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Del Mar Terrace Conservancy, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Allen v. California Board of Barber ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Katz v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API