Legal Opinion
Board of Supervisors of Merced County v. California Highway Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1976No. Civ. 15283PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, J.
On August 23, 1973, the California Highway Commission (“CHC”) approved construction of a state highway project (the “Pelendale Project”) in Stanislaus County. On October 18, 1974, the Department of Transportation, acting pursuant to the CHC authorization, awarded a contract in an amount exceeding $11 million for construction of the Pelendale Project in accordance with freeway standards. The plaintiff, the Board of Supervisors of Merced County, asserted that the CHC should have given a higher priority to a project in their county (the “Delhi Project”). Accordingly, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Friends of H Street v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Sklar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- City of Palo Alto v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- William S. Hart Union High School District v. Regional Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.