Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Oceanside Marina Towers Ass'n v. Oceanside Community Development Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1986No. D003324PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

In this mandate action, Oceanside Marina Towers Association (Association) challenges a negative declaration of environmental im pact filed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21064) by the Oceanside Community Development Commission (Commission) and the City of Oceanside (City). Members of the Association own and occupy the Marina Towers Luxury Condominiums which are located near the proposed site of a relocated railroad switchyard. The relocation of the switchyard from its current site in downtown Oceanside to the proposed site…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API