State v. Swann
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress DNA evidence is affirmed on three separate bases. First, the record before us does not contain an order for the expunction of DNA evidence collected in a prior criminal proceeding as asserted by defendant. Second, the statutory prerequisites to expunction are not present in the instant case as defendant’s previous criminal charges were neither dismissed by the trial court, nor did an appellate court reverse and dismiss a previous conviction. Third, the plain language of the expunction statutes clearly indicate that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. C.P.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. TrullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. MauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- SAM'S EAST, INC. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.