Legal Opinion
Votto v. American Car Rental, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 2005No. SC 17240PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*480 Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The defendant, American Car Rental, Inc., doing business as Acme Rent-A-Car, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Richard Votto, concluding that the motor vehicle rental agreement between the parties constituted a contract of adhesion, and that the defendant’s conduct with regard to the rental violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. The trial court awarded the plaintiff compensatory and punitive damages, together with attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Elm City Cheese Co. v. FedericoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Bifolck v. Philip Morris, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.