Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Joyce v. Farr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaRtin, J.

We will not now discuss or decide the question of the jurisdiction of the county court of Eau Claire county to probate the estate of the deceased Mary Cousins Joyce. That issue is raised on the petitioner’s plea in abatement which was filed in the county court of Eau Claire county on January 29, 1939, and which has not yet been decided by that court.

The law is well settled in this state that a writ of prohibition will not be issued where there is an adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise. State ex rel. Meggett v. O’Neill, 104 Wis. 227, 80 N. W. 447; State ex rel. Tewalt v. Pollard, 112 Wis.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In re HeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Tewalt v. PollardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Meggett v. O'NeillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Kowaleski v. District Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Schulter v. RoraffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API