In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
'ApplioatioNS for writs of prohibition to restrain tbe further prosecution of an action in tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county, on tbe ground that tbe summons bad not been properly served on petitioners. Tbe facts of tbe case and tbe allegations of tbe petitions are fully set forth in tbe opinion of tbe court and tbe dissenting •opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Winslow, O. ¡T.
Those are four separate petitions for writs of prohibition.- Tbe petitioners are all foreign manufacturing corporations and were joined as defendants with a large number of other foreign and domestic corporations in an action brought in tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county by tbe Yelie Motor Vehicle Company, a foreign corporation, •charging conspiracy to ruin its business and alleging damage to tbe amount of $500,000. Tbe summons and complaint in •said action were attempted to be served on tbe petitioners by service upon certain persons and domestic corporations alleged to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Umbreit v. HelmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Circuit Court for Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Prentice v. County Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Kowaleski v. District Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Hustisford Light, Power & Manufacturing Co. v. GrimmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.