Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cullen v. Ceci

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1970No. 5PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

After perfection of the appeal in this case, but prior to the time of argument, this court decided on May 6, 1969, State ex rel. Dore v. Stoltz (1969), 42 Wis. 2d 534, 167 N. W. 2d 214. This case held that:

“A writ of prohibition will not be issued when there is an adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise. See Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court (1961), 13 Wis. 2d 228, 231, 108 N. W. 2d 648. This court has long approved the use of habeas corpus to challenge the validity of the complaint and the validity of a bindover, and we now declare that this is the sole remedy for this type of situation.” (p.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. State v. PaszekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API