State Ex Rel. Schulter v. Roraff
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The appeal raises several issues: (1) Is prohibition a proper remedy to test the jurisdiction of the county court and the adequacy of the complaint; (2) should the state be permanently prohibited from further proceeding in the criminal action; (3) is the complaint defective; and (4) is sec. 947.15, Stats., unconstitutional ?
Writ of Prohibition.
We think the writ of prohibition was a proper remedy to test the jurisdiction of the judge of the county court as a magistrate to hold a preliminary examination on the alleged felony. Prohibition has been the subject of several recent cases in which the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Christensen v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Arnold v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.