Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schulter v. Roraff

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1968No. 314PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The appeal raises several issues: (1) Is prohibition a proper remedy to test the jurisdiction of the county court and the adequacy of the complaint; (2) should the state be permanently prohibited from further proceeding in the criminal action; (3) is the complaint defective; and (4) is sec. 947.15, Stats., unconstitutional ?

Writ of Prohibition.

We think the writ of prohibition was a proper remedy to test the jurisdiction of the judge of the county court as a magistrate to hold a preliminary examination on the alleged felony. Prohibition has been the subject of several recent cases in which the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Christensen v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Arnold v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API