Legal Opinion

Drugsvold v. Small Claims Court of Dane County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1961PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The appellants contend the circuit court under its supervisory control powers, may properly issue a writ of prohibition to restrain an inferior court from exercising jurisdiction it does not have and the small claims court was without jurisdiction because the Madison Credit Bureau was guilty of unauthorized practice of the law. There can be no question of the power of the circuit court in a proper case to issue a writ of prohibition in the exercise of its superintending control of an inferior court. Such power was granted by sec. 8, art. VII, Const. This court has often discussed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State ex rel. Ampco Metal, Inc. v. O'NeillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State ex rel. Tewalt v. PollardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Arnold v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Gaynon v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Jadair Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API