Legal Opinion
Owens v. City of Signal Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1984No. Civ. 68360PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Plaintiff Owens appeals from an order denying her request for an injunction against the enforcement of respondent City’s Municipal Code chapters 5.16 and 5.17. Said ordinances were adopted on July 7, 1981. They regulate massage establishments and massage technicians. On February 23, 1982, Owens filed the complaint in this action and contends that certain sections of these chapters are unconstitutional. We affirm the judgment.
The Circle Massage has operated a massage parlor in Signal Hill since 1970. In April 1979 Owens commenced to operate the Circle Massage which she…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- King's Health Spa, Inc. v. Village of Downers GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Steffes v. California Interscholastic FederationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.