Legal Opinion
State v. Tibbetts
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1922No. A-4036PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBessby, J.
The information filed in this case was based upon section 3757, R. L. 1910, and charged, in substance, that the defendants in error, E. R. Tibbetts and Carl Pleasant, on and before the 20th day of December, 1920, were contractors and partners, doing contract work for the city of Pawhuska in laying and installing sewer extensions for that city; and that defendant Raderick MacDonald was their foreman, and assisted and aided the contractors, and was overseer and gen eral manager of tbe work being done; that the current rate of wages in the city of Pawhuska, for the class of labor employed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Stettler v. O'HaraOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Ryan v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Ruark v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 37Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.