Legal Opinion

Ruark v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 37

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1929No. [Nos. 43-48, April Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The General Assembly of Maryland passed a statute known as chapter 91 of the Acts of 1910, whose sections 2 and 3 constitute that portion of the Public Local Laws of the City of Baltimore which is as follows: “516. That eight hours shall constitute a day’s work for all laborers, workmen or mechanics who may be employed by or on behalf of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore except in cases of extraordinary emergency which may arise in time of war or in cases where it may be necessary to work more than eight hours per calendar day for the protection of property or human life; provided, that…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Medical Waste Associates, Inc. v. Maryland Waste Coalition, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API