Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 1, 1938No. 27884PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This action questions the constitutionality of chapter 59, art. 1, Session Laws 1935, an oil and gas conservation measure commonly known as the “Well-Spacing Act,” whereby in certain proceedings had before the Corporation Commission said commission is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations as .to the spacing of oil and gas wells in the different pools of Oklahoma. The present action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by the plaintiff in error, a royalty owner, ¿gainst the defendants in error, colessees, to recover the sum of $988.68, allegedly due him as his share of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Hart v. ParhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. ColclazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Hunter Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.