Warren v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
Defendant’s principal assignment of error is based upon tbe denial of its motion to strike certain allegations from tbe complaint, on tbe ground tbat they were irrelevant and prejudicial.
Tbe motion, however, was made after answer and on the day the case was calendared for trial, and was denied for tbe reason tbat it was not made in apt time (C. S., 537). The defendant then asked tbat its motion be allowed as a matter of discretion, and this was denied as not being a matter in the court’s discretion. When the case was reached for trial three days later tbe defendant again moved to strike out…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Warren v. . SusmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Davis v. . DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hayes v. . PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hill v. . StansburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Beaman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Osborne v. . Canton and Kinsland v. . MacKeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Brittain v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.