Legal Opinion

Hogsed v. . Pearlman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1938PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbis appeal presents for review tbe ruling of tbe court below denying plaintiff’s motion to amend process and pleading by sub stituting for tbe name of tbe individual defendant sued (H. Pearlman, Trading as Pearlman’s Railroad Salvage Company) tbe name of Pearl-man’s Railroad Salvage Company, Incorporated, as tbe party defendant, without tbe issuance of process for tbe named corporation. Tbe court below, however, in denying tbe plaintiff’s motion to amend, entered an order making Pearlman’s Railroad Salvage Company, Incorporated, a party defendant, with leave to tbe plaintiff to file…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Jones v. . VanstorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Clevenger v. . GroverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Tickle v. . HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API