Legal Opinion

Hill v. . Stansbury

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1942No. 668. No. 669. No. 670PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe cases above numbered are all bere on appeals of defendants from a denial, in part, of motions to strike from tbe complaint various items, ranging from whole paragraphs to fragmentary expressions, and even single words. Tbe motions were made under C. S., 537, before answer .or demurrer, and before any extension of time to plead was-granted. Tbe motions were made upon tbe theory that tbe matter objected to is irrelevant and prejudicial.

Tbe cases were argued together in this Court, and for convenience, are so considered in tbe opinion.

All three of tbe cases are based on tbe commission of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Herndon v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Hensley v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Wright's Clothing Store, Inc. v. Ellis Stone & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Patuxent Development Co. v. BeardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API