Beaman v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
That the testimony offered by plaintiff, considered in the light most favorable to him, discloses negligence on the part of defendant may be conceded. If the judgment of nonsuit is to be sustained, it must be sustained for the reason plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
On this phase of the case we must admit that this appeal presents a close question. It is a borderline case in which the presumption the trial judge ruled correctly must be considered in determining whether the' appellant has shown prejudicial error. . , . .
“Every decision of a competent court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Gibson v. DudleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Goode v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Arvin v. McClintockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Thompson v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.