Legal Opinion

Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. Gerhold

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1896No. 6149PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from the district court of Platte county. Tried below before Sullivan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This suit was upon a promissory note executed by the defendant in error as part consideration for one of plaintiff’s harvesting machines. *398The defense interposed was breach of warranty of the machine. From a verdict and judgment thereon in favor of the defendant the plaintiff prosecutes error.

There is attached to the transcript a document purporting to be the bill of exceptions in the case, but it does not appear to have ever been filed with, nor is it in any manner authenticated by, the clerk of the district court; hence it must be disregarded by us. (Aultman v. Patterson, 14 Neb., 57; Hogan…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Glaze v. ParcelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wax v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State Insurance v. Buckstaff Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. C. Aultman & Co. v. PattersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Andres v. KridlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. WeedNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bednar v. BednarNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Palmer v. MiznerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hamer v. McFegganNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API