Legal Opinion

Hamer v. McFeggan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1897No. 7288PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Phelps county. Tried below before Beall, J.'

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This canse was brought to this court to obtain a review of an order confirming the sale of real estate. While the petition in error contains twenty-eight assignments, the only one argued in the brief relates to the appraisement, and all others will be disregarded. (Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. Gerhold, 47 Neb., 397; City of Kearney v. Smith, 47 Neb., 408.)

It is urged that the value placed upon the property was so low as to raise a presumption of fraud in making the appraisement. There are two answers to this contention: First, no objection was made to the appraisement until after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vought v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Smith v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ecklund v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. City of Kearney v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nebraska Land, Stock-Growing & Investment Co. v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Seaman v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Jarrett v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Elgutter v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API