Hamer v. McFeggan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Phelps county. Tried below before Beall, J.'
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This canse was brought to this court to obtain a review of an order confirming the sale of real estate. While the petition in error contains twenty-eight assignments, the only one argued in the brief relates to the appraisement, and all others will be disregarded. (Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. Gerhold, 47 Neb., 397; City of Kearney v. Smith, 47 Neb., 408.)
It is urged that the value placed upon the property was so low as to raise a presumption of fraud in making the appraisement. There are two answers to this contention: First, no objection was made to the appraisement until after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vought v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Ecklund v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Kearney v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nebraska Land, Stock-Growing & Investment Co. v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Seaman v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Jarrett v. HooverNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Elgutter v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898