Legal Opinion

C. Aultman & Co. v. Patterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion to quash the bill of exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

•This cause is submitted to the court on a motion to quash the bill of exceptions. First,' because it was not filed in the district court; and, second, because there is no certificate of the clerk attached to the same. The bill was signed by the judge and was ordered to be made a part of the record in the cause, and there is no evidence before the court that it was not properly filed. The first objection therefore is untenable. The second objection is more serious. The statute permits the original bill to be filed in this court, but requires the clerk to certify that it is the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wax v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API