State Insurance v. Buckstaff Bros.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Harr, J. Heard on. motion of defendant in error to affirm the judgment of the trial court.
1Per curiam
This cause was submitted on the motion of the defendant in error to affirm the judgment of the trial court. We have held, where an examination of the record of a cause brought to this court for review discloses that the petition in error presents-no question for consideration on a motion to dismiss the proceedings, the cause will be considered on its merits, and the judgment affirmed. (Upton v. Cady, 38 Neb., 209; Erck v. Omaha Nat. Bank, 43 Neb., 613.) The rule stated above is a salutary one, and its enforcement will tend to discourage the bringing of cases to this court for delay merely.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erck v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Credit Foncier of America v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Herbison v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- McCarn v. CooleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Stratton v. KnappNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Todd v. Board of Educational Lands and FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Backes v. SchlickNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Prokop v. MladyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Caldwell v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.