Legal Opinion
Eberhart v. LG Electronics USA, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 24, 2016No. Civil Action No. 15-1761PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
John Michael Vazguez, United States District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court by way of the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (“Amended Complaint” or “FAC”) filed by Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. (“LG”). D.E. ,37. Plaintiff William Eberhart opposed the motion (D.E. 47) and LG filed a reply (D.E, 50). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background1
This is a proposed class action against a major television manufacturer for deceptively marketing its televisions’ frame or refresh rates.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- CHEN v. WANGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- FEUSS v. ENICA ENGINEERING, PLLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- FLINT GROUP PACKAGING INKS NORTH AMERICA CORP. v. FOX INDUSTRIES INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- LILY OF THE SKY, LLC v. JIMENEZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- MILLS v. BYCKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.