Legal Opinion

FEUSS v. ENICA ENGINEERING, PLLC

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 22, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02034Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDIN FEUSS and CHRISTOPHER NADY, Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 20-02034 (KM) (JBC) v. OPINION ENICA ENGINEERING, PLLC, and REED BERINATO, Defendants. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: Sandin Feuss and Christopher Nady developed a technology for building- controlled systems (heating, air conditioning, etc.). The two agreed to work with Reed Berinato and his company, Enica Engineering, PLLC (“Enica”) (referred to together as “Berinato”), who would patent the technology and bring it to market. Berinato pursued the patent process, ultimately obtaining…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API