Legal Opinion
MILLS v. BYCK
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 24, 2019No. 2:19-cv-14349Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LAWRENCE MILLS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-14349 v. (JMV) (MF) HARRISON BYCK and KASURI & BYCK, OPINION & ORDER LLC, Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. Pro se Plaintiff Lawrence Mills seeks to bring this action in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. D.E. 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS his application to proceed in forma pauperis but DISMISSES the Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). As will be discussed below, however, the Court has real concems as…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.