Buchanan v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of simple assault. Contrary to his first argument on appeal, the evidence was sufficient to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that he assaulted the victim, Lieutenant Wilkins of the Metropolitan Police Department. Appellant also contends, however, that the judge as trier of fact made no unambiguous finding that he had the intent, required for assault by our decisions, to use force against the officer. Because we agree that the judge’s oral finding of guilt leaves unclear whether appellant indeed had the requisite intent — rather…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Vines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Esperanza Contreras v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- NATHANIEL COUSART v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- MARK E. LEWIS v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.