Legal Opinion
Williams v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 2005No. 04-CM-1089PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Following a bench trial, Antwan M. Williams was convicted of assault on Herbert Richey. On appeal, Williams asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, but he predicates this claim in substantial part on a contention that the trial judge erroneously analyzed the nature of proof that the prosecution was required to present in order to establish the elements of the offense. In our view, the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government, see Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 133-35 (D.C.2001) (en banc), could support…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Sousa v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Mungo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- RAYSHAWN CLARK, DWAYNE HILTON and PERNELL LEE v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Winston Manual Perez Hernandez v. US (Opinion)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.