Legal Opinion

Esperanza Contreras v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2015No. 13-CM-971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEESE, Associate Judge:

Appellant Esperanza Contreras challenges her (2012 Repl.). Ms. Contreras argues that the trial court erroneously denied her request for a jury trial and that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction. We affirm.

I

The government’s evidence at trial indicated the following. Ms. Contreras’s sixteen-year-old daughter left Ms. Contreras’s home with a friend. When they returned, Ms. Contreras was “very mad,” because she thought that her daughter and her daughter’s friend had been gone too long and because her daughter had not answered Ms. Contreras’s telephone…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. JAMES J. DORSEY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API