NATHANIEL COUSART v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Senior Judge:
Nathaniel Cousart appeals his convictions by a jury of aggravated assault while armed (AAWA) 1 and assault with a dangerous weapon (ADW). 2 He argues that the trial- court committed plain error in its instructions on both counts. We find no plain error. However, we publish this opinion because in instructing on the AAWA count, the trial court closely followed the model instructions in Criminal Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia (5th ed. rev. 2015), 3 but yet, in doing so, left open the possibility of argument for reversal that appellant makes here and others…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- LAMONT L. BUSKEY and KEITH A. SIMMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Caesar v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Lucas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.