Legal Opinion

NATHANIEL COUSART v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2016No. 15-CF-151PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

Nathaniel Cousart appeals his convictions by a jury of aggravated assault while armed (AAWA) 1 and assault with a dangerous weapon (ADW). 2 He argues that the trial- court committed plain error in its instructions on both counts. We find no plain error. However, we publish this opinion because in instructing on the AAWA count, the trial court closely followed the model instructions in Criminal Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia (5th ed. rev. 2015), 3 but yet, in doing so, left open the possibility of argument for reversal that appellant makes here and others…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LAMONT L. BUSKEY and KEITH A. SIMMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Caesar v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  3. Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Lucas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API