Legal Opinion

Hall v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA CTY.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1993No. A059468PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d 899], the California Supreme Court stated in no uncertain terms that, with limited exceptions, an arbitrator’s decision is not reviewable for errors of fact or law. Purporting to apply two statutory exceptions, the superior court here has vacated an arbitration award because (1) the arbitrator relied upon partnership principles, when the original complaint alleged agency, but not a partnership, and (2) the arbitrator denied a request to reopen to present additional evidence. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dryer v. Los Angeles RamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Ray Wilson Co. v. Anaheim Memorial Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Bono v. DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade SecuritiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API