Legal Opinion
Bono v. David
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 21, 2007No. A112099PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Julia Bono and Elicia W. David were two of several parties to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that contained a clause requiring mediation and arbitration of “[a]ny controversy among the parties involving the construction or application of any provision of this Agreement . . . .” The MOU was executed in 2000 by several tenants in common of Lake County property the group planned to develop. In 2005, respondent Bono brought an action for defamation against appellant David based on the contents of a 2004 e-mail David sent to a third party who was apparently…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Victoria v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Eng. & Architects Assn. v. Community Dev. Dept. of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- DMS Services, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Valencia v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rice v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Efund Capital Partners v. PlessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.