Legal Opinion

Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1990No. D009807PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates (Stanley Barber), a professional career consulting agency, appeals a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of Ed Cobler, its former client. The judgment also awarded costs payable by Stanley Barber to the American Arbitration Association (the AAA). Stanley Barber contends the judgment should be reversed because of apparent bias on the part of the arbitrator, because the award exceeds the jurisdiction conferred on the arbitrator by the agreement of the parties, and because there was no basis for an award of costs to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Luster v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Rice v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Van De Kamp v. GumbinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API