Van Dyke v. Chappell
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Plaintiff Welby J. Van Dyke filed suit against defendants Marion Glen and Dea-ma Ruth Chappell seeking to quiet title to property in Wayne County, Utah, on the theory of boundary by acquiescence. After a nonjury trial, the court entered an order quieting title in Van Dyke. The trial court found that Van Dyke owned the property in question, based on the theory that a fence line which divided the adjoining parcels of land established a boundary by acquiescence. The Chappells appeal, arguing that (i) the court improperly found that the parties intended the fence to be a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Sevy v. Security Title Co. of Southern UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.