Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Chappell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1991No. 890133PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiff Welby J. Van Dyke filed suit against defendants Marion Glen and Dea-ma Ruth Chappell seeking to quiet title to property in Wayne County, Utah, on the theory of boundary by acquiescence. After a nonjury trial, the court entered an order quieting title in Van Dyke. The trial court found that Van Dyke owned the property in question, based on the theory that a fence line which divided the adjoining parcels of land established a boundary by acquiescence. The Chappells appeal, arguing that (i) the court improperly found that the parties intended the fence to be a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sevy v. Security Title Co. of Southern UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API