Legal Opinion

Ault v. Holden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2002No. 20000690, 20001008PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice.

1 1 Leo and Virginia Ault (collectively, "the Aults") appeal from an order granting Darrell and Patsy Holden (collectively, "the Hol-dens") summary judgment, quieting title to two disputed parcels of property in the Hol-dens. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

T2 This matter involves claims by two adjoining landowners to a strip of land that runs along their respective properties in Vernon, Utah ("the strip"), and to another parcel ("the western parcel"). See Figure 1. 1 The lot to the north of the strip is owned by the Aults. The lot south of the strip is owned…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bakowski v. Mountain States Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API