Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:
This appeal involves two primary issues: (i) access to a road/trail called Burrs’ Lane; and (ii) the ownership of and access to a waterworks that provides the sole source of drinking water to a development commonly known as “The Groves” located in the Pine-crest area of Emigration Canyon. In addition, the various parties challenge the district court’s (i) imposition of sanctions on pro se plaintiffiattorney John Walsh; and (ii) refusal to impose sanctions on defendants’ attorneys. We affirm the substance of the district court’s judgment but reverse the imposition of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Reighard v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. CrosbyUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.