Legal Opinion

Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. Finlinson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1989No. 860171PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendants Rich Finlinson, Jos. T. Finlin-son, Inc., a corporation, Gordon Nielson, and John Doe I (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Finlinson”) appeal from a trial court decision that quiets title of a strip of land in plaintiffs Grayson Roper Limited Partnership and Grayson Roper (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Roper”). Finlinson claims the court erred in ruling that Roper’s quiet title action was not barred by sections 78-12-5 and 78-12-6 of the Code and in refusing to find that Finlinson had gained title to the disputed land through boundary by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ashton v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jensen v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Saunders v. SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. GardinerUtah Supreme Court · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API