State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
The State of Utah, through the Division of Consumer Protection, appeals a district court decision holding that the Motor Fuel Marketing Act (“the Act”) is unconstitutional. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-16-1 to -9 (1986 & Supp.1989) (amended 1987). 1 The court ruled that several provisions of the Act relating to its ban on below-cost sales violated the due process clauses of both the Utah and the United States Constitutions. Utah Const, art. I, § 7; U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd. (“Rio Vista”), cross-appeals the court’s denial of its request for an award of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Greaves v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Society of Separationists, Inc. v. WhiteheadUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.