Legal Opinion
Harte v. Peerless Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 16, 1962No. 1023PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
This action in equity was instituted to obtain declaratory relief concerning the coverage of an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant Peerless Insurance Company. The principal contention concerns the application of the "substitute vehicle” provision in the insurance agreement. The chancellor decreed there was no coverage under the policy. The defendant Delaware & Hudson Railroad Corporation suffered property damage from the operation of the vehicle for which protection is claimed. The railroad appeals.
There are two assignments of error. One concerns the exclusion of a question…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farley v. American Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cora Tanner, Administratrix of the Estate of Hudson Tanner, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- State v. AlpertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Young v. LamsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Glass v. Newport Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Armstrong v. Hanover Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Northern Oil Company, Inc. v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- American Fidelity Co. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.