Legal Opinion

Glass v. Newport Clothing Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

This action in contract, with declaration in the common counts, was originally brought by the plaintiff Barnet Glass. Upon the trial it appeared that one of the items of the specifications, amounting to $45.54, was claimed to be owed by the defendant not to Glass personally, but to a copartnership of which he was a member. He therefore moved for leave to join with him, as parties plaintiff, “Barnet Glass and Samuel Lisman, doing business under the firm name and style of Style Shoppe.” After hearing thereon, the motion was granted, and no exception appears to have been taken to the ruling. The…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Robbins v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  3. Morgan v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  4. Hall v. Vermont & Massachusetts RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  5. Jenkins v. Hawyeye Commercial Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Abatiell v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
  2. Harte v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  3. State v. MalmquistSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  4. Auclair v. VERMONT ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. Duchaine v. ZaetzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API